<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part Review: LM741</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/</link>
	<description>Analog electronics and everything else between 1 and 0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Role Of Vendors &#124; Engineer Blogs</title>
		<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/comment-page-1/#comment-14499</link>
		<dc:creator>The Role Of Vendors &#124; Engineer Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisgammell.com/?p=1817#comment-14499</guid>
		<description>[...] assuming that right at this moment there are students at my alma mater still using the same LM741 I used. No, not the same type or the same pin layout. I mean the exact  same 741. That&#8217;s how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assuming that right at this moment there are students at my alma mater still using the same LM741 I used. No, not the same type or the same pin layout. I mean the exact  same 741. That&#8217;s how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Part Review: LT4180 &#124; Chris Gammell&#039;s Analog Life</title>
		<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Part Review: LT4180 &#124; Chris Gammell&#039;s Analog Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisgammell.com/?p=1817#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>[...] out of the kindness of my heart, because they have some historical significance (as in the case of my review of the LM741) or most likely I think the technology is important and interesting. All opinions are my own and I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out of the kindness of my heart, because they have some historical significance (as in the case of my review of the LM741) or most likely I think the technology is important and interesting. All opinions are my own and I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisgammell</title>
		<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/comment-page-1/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisgammell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisgammell.com/?p=1817#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t think of too many situations where I would design in a 741 these days unless it was doing some super grunt work.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#039;t think of too many situations where I would design in a 741 these days unless it was doing some super grunt work.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/comment-page-1/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisgammell.com/?p=1817#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>So if you were designing a simple circuit, let&#039;s say a hearing amplifier for example, would you use a 741 opamp, or would you design around a newer part ?    Or would you simply use a newer IC from National dedicated to the specific task ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if you were designing a simple circuit, let's say a hearing amplifier for example, would you use a 741 opamp, or would you design around a newer part ?    Or would you simply use a newer IC from National dedicated to the specific task ? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Gammell</title>
		<link>http://chrisgammell.com/2010/06/27/part-review-lm741/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gammell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisgammell.com/?p=1817#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>The guts of chips is YOUR job Flux! I&#039;d love to link to a post you write about it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guts of chips is YOUR job Flux! I&#039;d love to link to a post you write about it! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

